The Mysteries of Greco-Egyptian Syncretism
From the fourth century B.C. to the fourth century A.D., the advent of Hellenistic internationalism brought with it a myriad of cultural changes and religious revelations. Egypt’s religions that had shaped its past thirty-one dynasties were suddenly reckoned with adaptation following the conquests of Alexander.[1] The religious phenomenon known as syncretism emerged, affecting Egyptian deities such as Isis and Serapis.[2] This fusion of religious beliefs, practices, and figures is argued to be caused by internationalism and is inherently flexible. Greco-Egyptian syncretism varied based on household and court interpretations.
Historian Caitlin Barrett argues that the decline of the old poleis and the increased mobility of Hellenistic populations had helped guide the spread of new religious practices throughout the Greco-Eygptian and Meditteranean regions.[3] As ancient Greek society underwent significant changes, including the decline of the traditional city-state model, people became increasingly mobile, moving across regions and encountering diverse cultural influences.[4] Suddenly, many polis-based religious practices no longer seemed entirely sufficient for this new world: historically rooted in the local context of individual poleis, traditional religious customs appeared insufficient in addressing the needs of a more interconnected and cosmopolitan society. Caitlin Barrett's argument cites Historian Le Glay, who emphasizes the emergence of a pan-Mediterranean religious tradition. This shift towards a broader, more inclusive religious framework gave worshippers a sense of belonging and continuity, irrespective of their physical location. In this pan-Mediterranean context, individuals could find a ready-made community that transcended the boundaries of specific city-states.[5]
The most significant occurrence of such Hellenistic mobility can be seen through the conquests of Alexander of Macedon. His syncretic endeavors can be traced back to the Egyptian god Ammon, whose power had been established in the XIIth Dynasty.[6] Associated with the Greek god of Zeus, Zeus-Ammon’s shrine in the Libyan Desert was frequently visited by pilgrims from all over the Mediterranean.[7] Soon, as Alexander started to be hailed by the Egyptian High Priest as the ‘Son of Ammon,’ his pathway to Memphis led him to become enthroned a Pharaoh.[8] As he expanded his conquests into Egypt, Alexander demonstrated a unique ability to integrate diverse religious traditions by associating with Ammon. The syncretic endeavors that followed were deeply influenced by the fusion of Greek and Egyptian spiritual elements, highlighting the adaptability of these traditions in response to the changing geopolitical landscape.
When Alexander started to create plans for Alexandria, a city he dreamed of being an “economic entrepôt and the religious metropolis of the world,” according to Arrian, he included the creation of temples for various gods from Egypt and Greece. As such, Alexander instilled his syncretic influence upon the creation of Alexandria, a center of metropolitan religion, lying at the heart of the Nile to the Danube.[9] Temples dedicated to various gods from both Egypt and Greece were established, solidifying the syncretic influence on the city's religious milieu. Alexandria fostered an environment where diverse faiths could coexist and interact.
After his untimely death in 323 B.C., Ptolemy I furthered his father’s founding interests and did not halt the syncretic momentum he had set in motion.[10] He continued to promote his father's founding interests and expanded the Greco-Egyptian syncretic tradition throughout the Hellenistic world. Thus, Alexander's role as a pharaoh initiated a unique religious synthesis and left a lasting legacy that shaped the religious landscape of the Mediterranean for centuries to come. Ptolemy’s now vast kingdom, including Egypt, Palestine, and the south-western shores of Asia Minor, had all the traditional characteristics of city-states, but the change of an Egyptian theocracy– in a sense, the Ptolemies were Pharaohs.[11] Soon, the Nile gods appeared along Asia Minor and in the Aegean. The Egyptian faith was carried into Rome through routes from Alexandria to Puteoli, and all the missionary work was being done through ordinary traders.[12] Hellenistic internationalism paved the way for syncretism, and Alexandria soon became a place where anyone could come to philosophize amongst its cosmopolitan background.[13] Its famous Museum and Library were the home of the religion of Isis and Serapis, with centuries worth of scholarly research and invention attributed to them.[14]
The intricacies of syncretism between the gods of Olympus and those of the Nile posed a significant challenge, necessitating Ptolemy's intervention. The contrast between the roles of Apollo in classical Greece and Egyptian solar theology exemplifies the complexities of Ptolemy's administration. Apollo, the unchallenged Sun God in Greece, held a different position in the Olympian hierarchy, being the son of Zeus and equivalent to Re in Egyptian solar theology[15] Ptolemy thus faced the intricate challenge of aligning these distinct narratives. He had to weave a tapestry that seamlessly incorporated elements from both traditions without diluting their unique cultural identities. As one such example, these syncretic puzzles needed consultants to solve.
The king chose the Egyptian Manetho of Sbennytus, who lived close to their shrine of Isis, and Timotheus, a member of the Athenian Eumolpid family who studied the Chthonian side of Hellenic religion.[16] As the king’s new counselor on syncretism, they sought to establish a divine hierarchy that would foremost appeal to the contemporary, international breadth of Ptolemy’s kingdom.[17] They pursued a simplifying process with arguably a Greek dominance. The reformation suppressed elements of Egyptian religion that would not fit into the Hellenic backbones.[18]
In this manner, the origins of Serapis and Isis have been much debated. As the Father Figure and ruler of Hades, Earth. and Heaven, Serapis was associated with Ammon, Zeus, and Poseidon.[19] As one of the gods thought to have protected human life, the reverence for Serapis became more powerful than those to the throne. He became associated with the healers like Apollo and Asclepius, who believed in invoking magical cures. The Sarapeum at Canopus writes that “because [Serapis] was much hallowed and did produce cures, people of the highest renown had faith and slept with it.’[20]In Egypt at the time of emperor Hadrian, those who even called themselves Christians were recorded to have also devoted their souls to Serapis, linking the two faiths.[21] Historian R.E. Witt, therefore, argues that Serapis was “deliberately created by the Ptolemaic theologians for export abroad.” His powers of assimilating the gods of Greece and those across the Mediterranean won international acceptance and cosmopolitanism.[22]
As for Isis, her local associations in Egypt were retained through distinctive epithets, which, as time went on, gained international currency—Isis of Pharos, Isis of Memphis, Isis of Paraetonium, etc.[23] Witt argues that her iconography was universally similar; with her hands holding the Egyptian timbrel or sistrum and a crown of stars with the crescent moon of an Egyptian uraeus on her head, either embellished with lotus flowers as a sign of purity, or ears of corn as the mark of plenty.[24] Her fine linen robes would be tied with a girdle formed into the "Isiac' or 'mystic' knot.[25] Though her features would undergo minor changes within varying iconography, amongst the Greeks, she was known for the foreign dress of the Nile.[26] The best-surviving existence of Isis among the Graeco-Roman practices can be seen in her domestic cults at Pompeii.[27] Though the columns of the Iseum were destroyed in an earthquake before the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 A.D., decorations of Isis are essential. Paintings of Isis-Fortuna identified with Luna and scenes of Isiac processions are within the House of Marriage.[28] The Iseum holds paintings with Isis holding the infant Harpocrates.[29] The Pompeians coalesced her with Diana, Ceres, and Panthea, giving them their daily bread and salvation in spiritual darkness.[30] Pompeii proves that the breadth of Greco-Egyptian syncretism had massive influence from its seaports from Alexandria. For merchants in particular, the access to Isiac cult associations at most significant ports may have provided not only a sense of fellowship but also a network of connections for doing business.[31]
However, such an interpretation speaks to the scholarly debate about the forces responsible for the international spread of Egyptian cults, Isis and Sarapis. Their pan-Mediterranean popularity could’ve been primarily the result of an official Ptolemaic government policy from the theories of Manetho and Timotheus, or the cults could have spread more organically through the action of mercenaries at ports.
In analyzing the complex fluidity of religion, it’s essential to acknowledge the nuances of interpretation. Historian Caitlin Barrett argues that the breadth of the public spread syncretism through cosmopolitan port cities can be shown through terracotta figures and textual & iconography.[32] For example, an analysis of Delos’ figurines and their manufacturing techniques and archaeological contexts seem to commonly depict processions of theological and political significance, showing the breadth of knowledge that civilians possessed. Barrett stresses that the producers and consumers of iconography were free to change their interpretations of their meanings.[33] On one occasion, the producers in Delos were making repeated and consistent allusions to Egyptian religious imagery, whereas a double cornucopia figurine that another produced did not possess detailed knowledge of the theological reasoning of Egypt.[34] As such, reasoning as to what degree Egyptian culture and theology were acknowledged and understood by the Greeks is hazy and seems to have not been standardized by any such court. Barrett also introduces an argument that the “bilingual” character of the iconography, or the comprehensibility within both Greek and Egyptian cultural contexts, would have shifted with the viewer’s degree of theological knowledge, giving oxygen to the argument for civilian spread.[35]
The transformative period from the fourth century B.C. to the fourth century A.D., marked by Hellenistic internationalism, triggered significant cultural shifts and religious transformations. Alexander's conquests play a pivotal role in the narrative, with his syncretic efforts rooted in the veneration of the Egyptian god Ammon. The association with Ammon led to Alexander being hailed as the 'Son of Ammon' by the Egyptian High Priest, culminating in his enthronement as a Pharaoh in Memphis. This unique ability to integrate diverse religious traditions set the stage for subsequent syncretic endeavors influenced by the fusion of Greek and Egyptian spiritual elements. The conquests of Alexander brought Egypt into the sphere of Hellenistic influence, leading to the emergence of syncretism that was influenced by both household and court interpretations, reflecting the adaptability of religious traditions in response to changing circumstances.
The founding of Alexandria further exemplifies the syncretic influence, as the city was envisioned as an economic entrepôt. The construction of temples dedicated to various gods from Egypt and Greece solidified Alexandria as a center of metropolitan religion, fostering an environment where diverse faiths could coexist and interact. Alexandria’s existence as a cosmopolitan center further promoted syncretism through its trade routes. Following Alexander's death, Ptolemy I continued to expand Greco-Egyptian traditions across the Hellenistic world. He navigated through the challenges of religious fusion with Manetho and Timotheus, showing the court’s passions and endeavors to spread an international religion, and their efforts show with the acceptance of Serapis and Isis gained pan-Mediterranean recognition and acceptance. The Ptolemies became Pharaohs, incorporating Egyptian theocracy into their rule. The spread of Nile gods to regions like Asia Minor and the Aegean, as well as the transmission of Egyptian faith to Rome through trade routes, highlights the enduring impact of Hellenistic internationalism on syncretism.
Whether this spread of Egyptian cults was primarily due to official Ptolemaic policies or organic dissemination through trade and cultural exchange remains debatable. However, in analyzing the fluidity of religious practices during this era, it becomes evident that the interpretation of syncretism was still carried through the household. Historians may argue that Serapis was deliberately created by Ptolemaic theologians for export abroad, but that only emphasizes the importance of religious syncretism to the Ptolemaic government. Archaeological evidence of Isis from Pompeii attests to her widespread influence as well. Acknowledging the nuances of interpretation and the role of cosmopolitanism is crucial to understanding the fluidity of Greco-Egyptian syncretism. Its existence underscores the enduring legacy of Alexander and Ptolemy in shaping the religious landscape of the Mediterranean. Alexandria’s creation as a hub of cultural exchange, not only facilitated the blending of diverse religious elements but also played a pivotal role in fostering a dynamic and ever-evolving Greco-Egyptian syncretism.
Notes
[1] R. E. Witt, Isis in the Graeco-Roman World. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971) 46.
[2] Luther H. Martin, Hellenistic Religions. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987) 10.
[3] Caitlín E. Barrett, Egyptianizing Figurines from Delos: A Study in Hellenistic Religion. (New York: Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, 2011) 438.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Witt, Isis in the Graeo-Roman World, 46.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Ibid, 47.
[11] Ibid, 48.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Ibid, 49.
[14] Ibid, 50.
[15] Ibid, 51
[16] Ibid, 52.
[17] Ibid.
[18] Ibid.
[19] Ibid, 53.
[20] Hopfner Theodor, Fontes Historiae Religionis Aegyptiacae. (Bonnae: In aedibus A. Marci et E.) 156. 21
[21] Richard E. Oster, Julius Firmicus Maternus: De errore profanum religionum. Introduction, translation and commentary, (Houston: Rice University, 1971) 2, 13.
[22] Witt, Isis in the Graeo-Roman World, 55.
[23] Ibid, 54.
[24] Ibid, 55.
[25] Ibid.
[26] Ibid.
[27] Ibid.
[28] Ibid, 82.
[29] Ibid, 82.
[30] Ibid, 84.
[31] Ibid, 450.
[32] Ibid, 422.
[33] Ibid, 433.
[34] Ibid, 433.
[35] Ibid, 434.
Bibliography
Barrett Caitlín E. Egyptianizing Figurines from Delos: A Study in Hellenistic Religion. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, V. 36. Leiden: BRILL, 2011.
Gasparini, Valentino, and Richard Veymiers. Individuals and Materials in the Greco-Roman Cults of Isis : Agents, Images, and Practices. Religions in the Graeco-Roman World Ser. Boston: BRILL, 2019.
Hopfner Theodor. 19221925. Fontes Historiae Religionis Aegyptiacae. Bonnae: In aedibus A. Marci et E. Weberi.
Martin, Luther H. Hellenistic Religions: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Martin, Luther H. Why Cecropian Minerva?: Hellenistic Religious Syncretism as System.” Numen 30, no. 2 (1983): 131–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3270060.
Oster, Richard E. Julius Firmicus Maternus: De errore profanum religionum. Introduction, translation and commentary. Houston: Rice University, 1971.
Thonemann, Peter. The Hellenistic Age (version First edition.). Firsted. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Witt, R. E., Isis in the Graeco-Roman World. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1971.
Woodard, Roger D. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.